ARRANGED BY SURNAME

 
       
A B C D E F  
G H I J K L  
M N O P Q R  
S T U V W Y ?
The Surname Index is set out in the format shown below.

To see the original baptism/newspaper/certificate information click on the name highlighted in blue. If the name of only one party to the marriage is highlighted this is because I have a baptism only for the highlighted individual. If baptism information has been found for both parties there is often some discrepancy in the spellings and dates provided and these are indicated thus, ALICE/LAETITIA.

FORENAME SURNAME DATE SPOUSE FORENAME SPOUSE SURNAME CORRECTIONS
           
MARY ECKHOFF 27 SEP 1910 HUGH (OWEN) McCABE different name in GRO index
PATRICK (THOMAS) EDWARDS 17 or 25 OCT 1909 MARY JANE DORAS/DOVAS (DOURAS) different name in GRO index
MABEL EGAN 06 JUL 1936 WILLIAM JAMES CARR GRO ref not found
CATHARINE EGELTON 18 JUL 1918 CHARLES (SYDNEY C.) FINCH different name in GRO index
HENRY S EGERTON 20 FEB 1922 MARY ELIZ. ROGERS name taken from GRO index
ANN ELLIS 10 JUN 1916 THOMAS SUTTON  
ANN EVANS 24 AUG 1914 WILLIAM McMAHON  
FRANCIS (CHARLES) EVANS 28 AUG 1920 MARGARET BRIDGET STAFFORD different name in GRO index
HANNA EVANS 30 NOV 1918 DANIEL McCORT  
JAMES/JOHN JAMES EVANS 16 MAY 1910 AGNES MULHEARN  
JAMES EVANS 31 JAN 1922 ALICE/LAETITIA O'HARE  

Guide to the CORRECTIONS column

All the entries in this index have been checked against the information provided by the lancsbmd and freebmd websites or the original civil registration indexes. Any discrepancies are highlighted in red.

Most of the discrepancies are of a minor nature (different name or date in GRO index) but if there are alternative spellings of the surname then the marriage will appear in the index under both forms - GRADY (O'GRADY) as well as (O'GRADY) GRADY - with the version obtained from the civil registration indexes in red.

Some of the baptism entries are incomplete or impossible to read and if a name or date has been obtained solely from the civil registration indexes then it will be marked "taken from GRO index" and highlighted in bold red.

A percentage of the marriages found were religious ceremonies, a marriage in a C.of E. church having already taken place some time earlier and I have included a note to this effect in the original 'baptism entry' (see example)

Finally, not all the marriages were found in the civil registration indexes, possibly for any or all of the reasons mentioned above, and this too is indicated in the corrections column.